Management of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia With Eltrombopag in a Patient With Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome
a Departamento de Hematología, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain
To the Editor,
To date, no consensus has been reached on the treatment of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who require antiplatelet therapy after experiencing acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
We report the case of a 55-year-old male smoker with hypertension who, as a child, was diagnosed with primary ITP, which responded to steroids. The patient had an asymptomatic relapse as an adult, without medical follow-up. He was admitted to the emergency room with non-ST-segment elevation ACS and a platelet count of 13 ÿ 109 cells/L, confirmed by a peripheral blood smear. After treatment with 40 mg of intravenous dexamethasone and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) at a dose of 1 g/kg body weight, his platelet count increased to 82 ÿ 109 cells/L in 24 hours. However, this increase was accompanied by severe precordial pain and ST elevation in anterior leads. Cardiac catheterization confirmed severe coronary artery disease in the proximal and mid anterior descending artery. The patient underwent primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with implantation of 2 XIENCE V drug-eluting stents (DES). Anticoagulation therapy consisted of enoxaparin and antiplatelet therapy consisting of clopidogrel and aspirin. After 15 days of treatment with prednisone (1 mg/kg body weight), an attempt to reduce the dose led to progressive thrombocytopenia, with generalized ecchymosis that developed at a platelet count of 65 ÿ 109 cells/L. Six months after stent implantation, iatrogenic damage due to chronic corticosteroid therapy was evident, and we had to select the best therapeutic option for a patient with symptomatic corticosteroid-dependent ITP, with a platelet count < 65 ÿ 109 cells/L, but whose bleeding was attributed not so much to the thrombocytopenia as to the dual antiplatelet therapy (which, given the patient's cardiovascular risk and the double stent placement, would need to be maintained for 6 more months to complete the 1-year treatment regimen).
In emergency situations, injection of IVIg may be appropriate, but not as regular treatment: several cases of ACS associated with IVIg therapy have been reported in patients with primary ITP,1, 2, 3 and in our patient, ST elevation coincided with its administration.
There were 2 long-term options: to administer aspirin alone for antiplatelet therapy-which would probably permit safe steroid reduction, but would increase thrombotic risk-or maintain dual antiplatelet therapy and attempt a second therapeutic line for primary ITP.
Splenectomy is the second-line treatment most widely recommended by current therapeutic consensus guidelines but was not an option for our patient at this stage of his disease for 2 reasons: first, it would require clopidogrel discontinuation, which would increase the thrombotic risk 6 months after ACS with double DES and, second, the change would be definitive (after the first year, he would foreseeably be taking a single antiplatelet agent; if the patient, although thrombocytopenic, maintained a safe platelet count without treatment, splenectomy might prove to have been unnecessary).
The thrombopoietin receptor agonists, eltrombopag and romiplostim, are recommended as second-line therapy when splenectomy is not indicated. However, they are discouraged in patients with high thrombotic risk. Although no cases of eltrombopag use have been published in patients with recent ACS, acute stent thrombosis has been reported in a patient receiving romiplostim.4 Other treatments for primary ITP are available for compassionate use, but there is no experience in ACS.
After considering the different options, we decided to maintain the dual antiplatelet therapy and administer eltrombopag to achieve a count of 60 to 80 ÿ 109 platelets/L. After 1 week with 50 mg/d of eltrombopag, it was possible to discontinue prednisone and, with a dose of 25 mg/d, to maintain counts of 49 to 91 ÿ 109 platelets/L until 1 year had elapsed since the double stent implantation, and there were no further bleeding episodes or thrombotic complications. Subsequent withdrawal of clopidogrel allowed discontinuation of eltrombopag and maintenance of antiplatelet therapy with aspirin alone. Three months later, the patient remained asymptomatic with a platelet count of around 30 ÿ 109 cells/L.
A review of the limited literature on the topic shows that some authors propose dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients with platelet counts > 30 ÿ 109 cells/L without bleeding, and implantation of bare metal stents to reduce the period of clopidogrel therapy.3, 5 In a case of chronic asymptomatic ITP (platelets > 100 ÿ 109 cells/L), DES were implanted and the patient received dual antiplatelet therapy with no bleeding complications.6 However, we have found no reports describing the treatment of patients with DES implanted during an episode of asymptomatic ITP, when the risk of stent thrombosis is very high if dual antiplatelet therapy is discontinued,6 even when the platelet count is low,2 but the bleeding risk is also high due to the concomitance of thrombocytopenia and antiplatelet therapy. Given the lack of high-quality scientific evidence regarding the management of these patients, recommendations cannot be made concerning their treatment, which should be individualized to minimize both risks. Special attention should be paid to the choice of the stent, as it will influence the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. In our experience, with dual antiplatelet therapy, eltrombopag can be a safe and effective alternative after failed corticosteroid therapy, when splenectomy is not an option.
Corresponding author: email@example.com
Bibliography1. Paolini R, Fabris F, Cella G. Acute myocardial infarction during treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Hematol. 2000;65:177-8.
2. Hidalgo-Urbanos R, Carrascosa-Rosilloa C, Martínez-Quesada M, González-Valdayoa M. Trombosis subaguda de stent en paciente con púrpura trombocitopénica idiopática tratado con inmunoglobulina intravenosa. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008;61:329-31.
3. Zaid G, Dawod S, Rosenschein U. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura and myocardial infarction: a dilemma of management. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013;15:775-6.
4. Rayoo R, Sharma N, Van Gaal WJ. A case of acute stent thrombosis during treatment with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist peptide¿romiplostim. Heart Lung Circ. 2012;21:182-4.
5. Kikuchi S, Hayashi Y, Fujioka S, Kukita H, Ochi N. A case of intracoronary stent implanted for acute myocardial infarction in an elderly patient with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2002;39:88-93.
6. Moretti C, Teresa Lucciola M, Morena L, et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and percutaneous coronary stenting: a dangerous duo?. Int J Cardiol. 2008;130:e96-7.