You are accessing a medical content website
Are you a health professional?

 
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2017;70:411 - Vol. 70 Num.05 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.02.007

Heart Failure Programs / Units. A Multidisciplinary Approach. Response

Manuel Anguita a,, José L. Lambert b, Javier Segovia c

a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
b Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
c Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Refers to

Heart Failure Programs / Units. A Multidisciplinary Approach
Luis Manzano, Álvaro González-Franco, José Manuel Cerqueiro, Manuel Montero Pérez-Barquero
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2017;70:410
Full text - PDF

Article

To the Editor,

We are grateful for the interest shown by Manzano et al. in our article published in Revista Española de Cardiología on the nomenclature and quality standards of heart failure (HF) units.1 We also thank them for their positive and favorable comments on the need to clearly define the characteristics of the different types of HF units and their requirements, which were expressed in the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Cardiology within the SEC-Excellent project. We agree with the view that HF is one of the most important health problems in Western countries, including Spain, and on the need to improve health care for HF patients.

A key part of the strategy to achieve this aim is the changeover to a chronic management model based on specialized HF units and programs and the coordinated and integrated participation of the various professionals and services involved in the treatment of HF patients. Cardiology and internal medicine play a fundamental role among these services (without, of course, forgetting primary and urgent care services). As reported by Manzano et al., it has been shown that models based on HF units improve prognosis and the quality of life of HF patients, and reduce the readmission rate and even patient mortality, both within cardiology units2 and in internal medicine services, such as those within the Integrated Management Units for Patients with Heart Failure program.3 The next logical step is to move toward a coordinated organization shared between cardiology and internal medicine, as proposed in the recent consensus document signed by the Spanish Society of Cardiology and the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. This document recommends the creation of HF programs/units shared between cardiology and internal medicine in all Spanish hospitals.4 Finally, the idea of our 2 societies is to complete the HF process or clinical pathway with the participation in these management models of primary care physicians and the scientific societies that represent them.

In conclusion, we would like to take advantage of the opportunity offered by the letter by Manzano et al. to settle an old controversy, already happily resolved, on who should treat HF: cardiologists or internists?5, 6 The answer is: cardiologists and internists, working together in these HF programs and units. The “who” matters less than the “how”. What is important is to provide patients with health care under the best quality standards in an integrated and coordinated manner, as recommended in the position statements of our 2 societies.1, 4

Corresponding author: m.anguita.sanchez@hotmail.com

Bibliography

1. Anguita Sánchez M, Lambert Rodríguez JL, Bover R, et al. Tipología y estándares de calidad de las unidades de insuficiencia cardiaca: consenso científico de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2016;69:940-50.
2. Jonkman NH, Westland H, Groenwold RH, et al. What are effective program characteristics of self-management interventions in patients with heart failure? An individual patient data meta-analysis. J Card Fail. 2016;22:861-71.
3. Cerqueiro JM, González-Franco A, Montero Pérez-Barquero M, et al. Reducción de ingresos y visitas a urgencias en pacientes frágiles con insuficiencia cardiaca: resultados del programa asistencial UMIPIC. Rev Clin Esp. 2016;216:8-14.
4. Sociedad Española de Cardiología, Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna. Propuesta conjunta SEC-SEMI para la organización compartida de nuevos modelos de atención al paciente con insuficiencia cardíaca en base a programas y unidades de insuficiencia cardiaca. Madrid: SEC-SEMI;2016 [accessed 20 Nov 2016]. http://secardiologia.es/publicaciones/catalogo/documentos-de-consenso/8131-documento-de-consenso-sec-semi.
5. Anguita Sánchez M, Vallés Belsúe F. ¿Quién debe tratar la insuficiencia cardiaca?. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2001;54:815-8.
6. Anguita Sánchez M. Tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca. Papel del cardiólogo. Rev Clin Esp. 2001;201:429-30.

1885-5857/© 2017 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved