You are accessing a medical content website
Are you a health professional?

 
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2017;70:254-60 - Vol. 70 Num.04 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.08.001

Epicardial Adipose Tissue in the General Middle-aged Population and Its Association With Metabolic Syndrome

Álvaro Calabuig a,, Joaquín Barba a,b, María Jesús Guembe b,c, Javier Díez a,b,d, Jesús Berjón b,e, Eduardo Martínez-Vila b,f, Pablo Irimia b,f, Estefanía Toledo b,g,h

a Departamento de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
b Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
c Servicio de Planificación, Evaluación y Gestión del Conocimiento, Sección de Formación, Departamento de Salud, Gobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
d Programa de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
e Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
f Departamento de Neurología, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
g Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
h Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) - Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Madrid, Spain

Keywords

Epicardial fat. Metabolic syndrome. Transthoracic echocardiography. General population. RIVANA Study.

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

There is currently increasing interest in epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) as a marker of cardiovascular disease. Our purpose was to describe EAT, measured by transthoracic echocardiography, and to assess its association with metabolic syndrome (MS) in the RIVANA population-based study.

Methods

Physical examination was performed in 880 participants aged 45 to 74 years (492 of them with MS according to the harmonized definition). Fasting glucose, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and C-reactive protein concentrations were determined in a blood sample. In all participants, EAT thickness was measured with transthoracic echocardiography at end-systole.

Results

Among participants without MS, the prevalence of EAT ≥ 5 mm significantly increased with age (OR > 65 years vs 45-54 years = 8.22; 95%CI, 3.90-17.35; P for trend < .001). Increasing EAT quintiles were significantly associated with MS (OR fifth quintile vs first quintile = 3.26; 95%CI, 1.59-6.71; P for trend = .001). Considering the different MS criteria, increasing quintiles of EAT were independently associated with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR fifth quintile vs first quintile = 2.65; 95%CI, 1.16-6.05; P for trend = .028), high triglycerides (OR fifth quintile vs first quintile = 2.22; 95%CI, 1.26-3.90; P for trend = .003), and elevated waist circumference (OR fifth quintile vs first quintile = 6.85; 95%CI, 2.91-16.11; P for trend < .001).

Conclusions

In a subsample of the general population, EAT measured by echocardiography increased significantly and independently with age. Increased EAT thickness was independently associated with MS and with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high triglycerides, and elevated waist circumference as individual criteria.

Article

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is currently one of the leading causes of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death worldwide. Together with overweight, obesity causes at least 2.8 million deaths worldwide each year, 3% to 9% of potential years of life lost, and is responsible for at least 35% of cases of coronary artery disease.1, 2, 3 It is intimately related to the development of atherosclerosis and the subsequent increase in cardiovascular risk.4 This risk depends, however, on the location of the excess adipose tissue. Ectopic adiposity has been reported to imply a higher cardiovascular risk than subcutaneous adiposity.5 Therefore, interest in ectopic adiposity is currently growing.

Each organ-specific visceral fat deposit has been proven to be anatomically and functionally different6, 7, 8; furthermore, due to its proximity to vital organs, visceral fat deposit may play a local modulatory role in addition to having a systemic effect.5 Specifically, epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is anatomically and functionally contiguous to the myocardium and is in direct contact with the coronary vasculature. It can produce and secrete bioactive molecules, which can modulate adjacent myocardium through different mechanisms, and can exert mechanical, thermogenic, and metabolic effects.9, 10

The role of EAT in CVD, however, is still not completely clear, and the mechanisms by which it can produce atherosclerosis are complex and not completely understood.8 Nevertheless, there is strong scientific-based evidence that increased EAT is associated with prevalent11 and incident12 metabolic syndrome (MS), insulin resistance in obese persons and postmenopausal women,13, 14 visceral adiposity,14, 15, 16, 17 cardiac structural abnormalities,18, 19, 20 and, moreover, with incident and prevalent coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events.21, 22, 23 However, studies describing echocardiographically measured EAT in the general population are scarce,12, 20 and there are substantial differences between ethnic groups.11, 24 Our purpose was a) to describe EAT by age and sex in a healthy sample of the general population, and b) to determine the association of EAT with MS and its various different components.

METHODS

Study Population

The present study is included in the RIVANA study,25, 26 which was designed to study the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and MS in the Spanish province of Navarre, their relationship with asymptomatic CVD, and their impact on vascular disease after a 10-year follow-up. Initially, 5682 participants aged between 35 and 84 years were randomly selected from the electoral registry of Navarre, obtaining a response rate of 73.4%. Accordingly, the final sample size was 4168. A subsample of 1100 participants aged 45 to 74 years was selected to constitute a cohort to address the incidence of MS and asymptomatic CVD, according to different markers of cardiovascular risk: 550 with MS randomly selected from those participants with MS according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria27 and 550 randomly selected participants free of MS, all of them free of CVD at baseline. This sample size was calculated on the basis of a 1:1 exposed to nonexposed ratio, a cumulative incidence of 0.045 to 0.05 for cardiovascular events, an estimated hazard ratio of 2 for MS, a statistical power of 80%, and an a priori defined alpha error of 0.05. The sample size was overestimated by an additional 10%. Finally, 900 participants (435 with MS and 465 free of MS) were recruited and underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Eventually, 20 participants were excluded due to baseline atrial fibrillation or other pathological cardiac conditions unknown to the participants prior to the baseline examination. Thus, the resultant effective sample size for our analyses was 880 participants (423 with MS and 457 free of MS according to the Adult Treatment Panel III definition of MS). All participants gave their informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Government of Navarre, Spain.

Metabolic Syndrome Ascertainment

As previously indicated, participants were initially classified according to the 2001 Adult Treatment Panel III definition of MS,27 which was the prevailing criteria when we performed this study. We decided to reclassify the patients according to the International Diabetes Federation classification established in 200628 and subsequently harmonized,29 which is currently more widely used. In this classification, participants must have at least 3 of the following criteria: waist circumference ≥ 102 cm in men or ≥ 88 cm in women; triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.69 mmol/L) or treatment with a triglyceride-lowering drug; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) < 40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L) in men or 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in women or drug treatment for low HDL-C; systolic or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 130 or 85 mmHg respectively, or treatment with blood pressure-lowering drugs; fasting glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) or prescribed treatment for established diabetes. According to the harmonized definition, the final sample for our analyses included 492 participants with MS and 388 participants free of MS.

Assessment of Epicardial Adipose Tissue

At baseline, all participants underwent targeted M-mode recordings, 2-dimensional imaging, and Doppler ultrasound measurements (Phillips 7500, Andover, Massachusetts, United States) according to published standards.30 On echocardiography, EAT thickness was measured on the right ventricle anterior free wall at end-systole, as recommended by Iacobellis.15, 31 All echocardiographic studies were done by a trained cardiologist.

Physical Examination and Determination of Biological Parameters

Finally, all participants underwent a physical examination, with measurement of waist circumference, height, weight, and blood pressure. Body mass index was calculated as the weight divided by the square of the height (kg/m2) and was categorized into normal weight (< 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 to < 30 kg/m2), and obesity (≥ 30 kg/m2). A fasting blood sample was taken, and fasting glucose, HDL-C, plasma triglycerides, and high-sensitivity specific C-reactive protein were determined.

Assessment of Other Covariates

Information on sociodemographic factors and smoking were gathered in the baseline interview, and smoking was classified in 3 categories (current-, former-, or never-smokers).

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics are presented as mean ± standard deviation or absolute numbers (percentage) separately for men and women. To assess the association between age and increased EAT (cutoff value 5 mm), we used nonconditional logistic regression models and considered sex, smoking, body surface area (tertiles), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (dichotomous), body mass index, and waist-to height ratio (dichotomous) as potential confounders; in an additional model, we further adjusted for MS criteria, according to a previous publication and the clinical relevance of potential confounders.21 We also evaluated the interaction between age and sex in their association with EAT with the likelihood ratio test. Mean differences in EAT by age among men and women without MS were assessed with crude and multivariable adjusted linear regression models.

To assess the association between EAT quintiles and the prevalence of MS or its different components, we also used nonconditional logistic regression models with EAT as an independent variable and MS or its components as dependent variables, taking into account the same potential confounders, based on previous publications and their clinical relevance.12, 16, 21 Goodness-of-fit was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the model specification with the link test. All analyses were performed with STATA/SE 13.1 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LP). All P values are 2-tailed and statistical significance was set a priori at P < .05.

RESULTS

In our study, we included 880 participants. Baseline characteristics according to the presence of MS are displayed in Table 1 separately for men and women. Among participants without MS, women had a lower prevalence of overweight and smoking and a lower body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and serum levels of low density lipoprotein cholesterol, fasting glucose and triglycerides. Also women had higher HDL-C levels.

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of the RIVANA Participants by MS and Sex

 

  With MS (n = 492) Without MS (n = 388)
  Men Women Men Women
n 253 239 160 228
Age, y 58 ± 7 60 ± 8 56 ± 7 54 ± 7
Height, cm 170 ± 6 156 ± 5 169 ± 6 157 ± 6
Weight, kg 87 ± 11 75 ± 12 76 ± 9 62 ± 10
Body mass index, kg/m2 30.5 ± 3.6 31.5 ± 5.1 26.7 ± 2.9 25.2 ± 4.1
Overweight, n (%) 123 (48) 86 (35) 95 (59) 71 (31)
Obesity, n (%) 126 (49) 133 (55) 21 (13) 27 (12)
Waist-to-height ratio 0.62 ± 0.05 0.64 ± 0.07 0.55 ± 0.04 0.53 ± 0.08
Smoking
Current smoker, n (%) 91 (36) 38 (16) 48 (30) 51 (22)
Never smoker, n (%) 42 (17) 159 (67) 43 (27) 108 (48)
Former smoker, n (%) 120 (47) 42 (18) 69 (43) 69 (30)
Hypertension, n (%) 207 (81) 186 (77) 77 (48) 61 (27)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus, n (%) 71 (28) 55 (23) 8 (5) 1 (0.4)
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 190 (75) 186 (77) 91 (56) 121 (53)
Hypertriglyceridemia, n (%) 157 (62) 113 (47) 17 (10) 10 (4)
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg, 150 ± 16 146 ± 18 137 ± 17 126 ± 17
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg 87 ± 9 86 ± 9 81 ± 10 77 ± 10
Serum LDL-C, mg/dL 132 ± 36 132 ± 32 134 ± 32 128 ± 30
Serum HDL-C, mg/dL 50 ± 11 58 ± 15 61 ± 12 74 ± 15
Serum triglyceride, mg/dL 190 ± 137 155 ± 90 101 ± 47 83 ± 33
Blood glucose, mg/dL 122 ± 33 117 ± 31 102 ± 18 93 ± 8
C-reactive protein, mg/dL 4.0 ± 4.8 5.1 ± 5.9 2.6 ± 3.0 2.8 ± 5.7

HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS, metabolic syndrome.
Unless otherwise indicated, values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

The association between age and EAT among participants without MS is shown in Table 2. The presence of EAT ≥ 5 mm significantly increased with age. Compared with participants aged 45 to 54 years, those aged 55 to 64 years had a 4.11 times higher odds of high EAT (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 2.32-7.28; P for trend < .001) and participants aged 65 years or older had a 8.22 higher odds of high EAT (95%CI, 3.90–17.35; P for trend < .001). Mean EAT by age and sex, are presented in the Table of the supplementary material. For both men and women, older participants showed higher EAT than younger participants and the linear trend was statistically significant. These results were hardly changed by additional adjustment for MS criteria. On average, men had a higher EAT than women (5.75 mm [95%CI, 5.50–5.99] for men and 5.43 [95%CI, 5.21–5.64] for women; adjusted mean difference 0.46 mm [95%CI, 0.10–0.82]; P = .011).

Table 2. Epicardial Adipose Tissue ≥ 5 mm by Age Among Participants Without Metabolic Syndrome

 

  45-54 y (n = 197) 55-64 y (n = 136) ≥ 65 y (n = 55) P for trend
Crude 1 (ref.) 3.22 (1.96–5.27) 6.02 (3.16–11.46) < .001
Sex-adjusted 1 (ref.) 3.23 (1.97–5.29) 6.05 (3.17–11.54) < .001
Multivariable adjusted model * 1 (ref.) 4.11 (2.32–7.28) 8.22 (3.90–17.35) < .001

Values are expressed as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals).

* Adjusted by sex, smoking, body surface area (tertiles), C-reactive protein (dichotomous), overweight, obesity, and waist-to-height ratio (dichotomous).

Higher EAT quintiles were associated with an increased prevalence of MS (Table 3). After adjustment for overweight, obesity, and waist-to-height ratio, the association remained statistically significant (odds ratio for the fifth vs the first quintile = 3.26 [95%CI, 1.59–6.71]; P for trend = .001).

Table 3. Metabolic Syndrome by Quintiles of EAT

 

Quintiles of EAT First (n = 183) Second (n = 178) Third (n = 170) Fourth (n = 185) Fifth (n = 164) P for trend
Crude model 1 (ref.) 2.26 (1.44–3.56) 5.26 (3.32–8.34) 6.78 (4.28–10.74) 26.41 (14.54–47.98) < .001
Age- and sex-adjusted 1 (ref.) 2.21 (1.39–3.49) 4.68 (2.92–7.50) 5.92 (3.69–9.51) 22.15 (12.05–40.72) < .001
Multivariable adjusted model 1* 1 (ref.) 1.70 (1.05–2.77) 2.92 (1.76–4.84) 3.07 (1.84–5.12) 8.52 (4.42–16.43) < .001
Multivariable adjusted model 2** 1 (ref.) 1.24 (0.73–2.13) 1.64 (0.94–2.86) 1.57 (0.89–2.78) 3.26 (1.59–6.71) .001

EAT, epicardial adipose tissue.
Values are expressed as odds ratios (95% confidence intervals).
*Model 1: Adjusted by sex, age, smoking habit, body surface area (continuous), and C-reactive protein (continuous).
**Model 2: Model 1 + overweight, obesity and waist-to-height ratio (continuous).

The Figure shows the association between increasing EAT quintiles and individual MS criteria. We observed that increasing EAT was associated with lower HDL-C, hypertriglyceridemia, and the presence of abdominal obesity after adjustment for potential confounders.

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the different Adult Treatment Panel III/International Diabetes Federation metabolic syndrome criteria according to quintiles of epicardial adipose tissue. HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Q, quintile; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. *Adjusted by age, sex, smoking, body surface area (continuous), C-reactive protein (continuous), overweight, obesity, and waist-to-height ratio (continuous). **Adjusted by age, sex, smoking, body surface area (continuous), C-reactive protein (continuous), overweight, and obesity.

Figure. Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the different Adult Treatment Panel III/International Diabetes Federation metabolic syndrome criteria according to quintiles of epicardial adipose tissue. HDL, high-density lipoprotein; Q, quintile; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. *Adjusted by age, sex, smoking, body surface area (continuous), C-reactive protein (continuous), overweight, obesity, and waist-to-height ratio (continuous). **Adjusted by age, sex, smoking, body surface area (continuous), C-reactive protein (continuous), overweight, and obesity.

For all models, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed an adequate goodness-of-fit.

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that EAT increases with age among participants without MS. In addition, increased EAT was associated with a higher prevalence of MS and with lower HDL-C, hypertriglyceridemia, and the presence of abdominal obesity.

The MS is an important health problem in Spain since it has an estimated prevalence of 22.7%32 and, as is well known, it has been associated with an impaired metabolic and inflammatory profile.33

Interest has focused on EAT as a potential marker and modulator of cardiovascular function due to its location and proximity to the myocardium and coronary vasculature. Measurement of EAT by TTE, as an objective marker of visceral fat levels14, 16, 31 and as an effective predictor of the risk of developing MS,12, 14, 34 could be used to identify at-risk individuals.

General cutoff points have not yet been established for several reasons. It is known that EAT differs considerably among ethnic groups,11, 24 due to differences in body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk. Another controversial point is the time in the cardiac cycle when EAT thickness may be more accurately measured. Some authors support measuring EAT during end-systole, as in our case, due to EAT deformation and underestimation during diastole. Others measure EAT during end-diastole in order to be consistent with cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance measurements. Last, there is a lack of data in general populations describing EAT and evaluating its distribution with age, and its association with subclinical markers of cardiometabolic impairment.

In our analysis, we chose 5 mm as a cutoff point. Despite the absence of consensus, several authors have postulated that measurements > 5 mm should represent a relevant cutoff to define increased EAT, especially in low-risk populations, although these values should be supported by larger studies.35, 36

A large body of scientific-based evidence currently supports the relationship of EAT with impaired cardiometabolic profile11 and increased cardiovascular risk21, 22, 23 but most research has been conducted in selected populations or in patients referred to physicians. To our knowledge, scarce evidence is available on TTE-measured EAT in the general population and even less is available in Caucasian participants. In the general population, EAT volume has previously been measured with computed tomography in Caucasians.21, 24, 37, 38, 39 Only a few studies have measured echocardiographic EAT thickness in the general population in non-Caucasians,12, 40 while, to our knowledge, only 1 recently published study has previously measured echocardiographically-measured EAT thickness and its association with MS in Caucasian participants from a general population.20 However, in this latter study, increased EAT was not associated with greater age and the association between EAT and MS was significant only among women. Moreover, in the PLIC study,20 women had significantly more EAT than men (4.00 mm, 95%CI, 0.10–8.00 in men vs 4.5 mm, 95%CI, 0.20–9.00 in women; P = .013) while in our study found the opposite. The reason for these differences could be that the PLIC study was actually composed mainly of postmenopausal women, with a median age of 68 years (interquartile range, 50-77.6).

We found that increased EAT thickness was associated with hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL-C, and abdominal obesity. On the other hand, compared with subcutaneous adipose tissue, EAT is rich in saturated fatty acids6 and has a greater capacity for free fatty acid release and uptake than any other visceral fat depot.41 Hence, EAT has been proposed to provide energy for the myocardium and at the same time to work as a buffer to protect the heart against exposure to excessively high fatty acid levels. It remains unclear whether EAT is increased due to dyslipidemia, in order to protect the heart from elevated triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations, or whether it simply reflects the excess of visceral adipose tissue that eventually causes MS and insulin resistance.

Limitations and Strengths

This study has several limitations. First, our subsample cannot be considered exactly a representative sample of the population, given that the participants were selected from the original sample depending on the presence of MS, as described in the methods section. Second, multidetector computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance, the latter considered the gold standard, can certainly more accurately assess epicardial fat than TTE, since they measure the whole EAT volume instead of just 1 slice. In contrast, despite being less accurate, echocardiography is more accessible, less expensive, has excellent reproducibility,34 and has shown a good correlation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.15, 16, 42

Our study also has several strengths. First, it was conducted with over 800 community-dwelling asymptomatic participants without CVD. Second, we decided to reclassify our patients with MS according to the International Diabetes Federation harmonized definition29 instead of the Adult Treatment Panel III classification27 initially planned at the time of study performance. The harmonized definition is currently more widely used and may reduce misclassification bias. Third, all TTEs were conducted by a trained cardiologist.

CONCLUSIONS

In a sample from a population-based study, echocardiographically measured EAT thickness increased with age and was directly associated with MS and reduced HDL-C, hypertriglyceridemia, and the presence of abdominal obesity as individual components. Further investigation is needed to determine the physiopathology of EAT, its association with CVD, and its usefulness in discriminating participants at high cardiovascular risk.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the Government of Navarre and the Spanish Ministry of Health and Social Politics, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria Pl 05/2364).

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?
  • - Epicardial fat is the visceral fat depot of the heart and is able to secrete bioactive molecules with modulatory effects on the myocardium.

  • - Epicardial fat has been associated with MS and with incident and prevalent coronary artery disease.

  • - There are few data on echocardiographically-measured epicardial fat thickness in the general population.

WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?
  • - This study provides information about the behavior of epicardial fat thickness in asymptomatic CVD-free participants from the general population and its relationship with cardiometabolic profile.

  • - To our knowledge, this is the first study to measure echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness in a subsample from a representative sample of the Caucasian population.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the entire RIVANA study investigation team, who made possible the data collection; the Navarre Government for their support and funding of the RIVANA study, and last, all the participants, especially those who collaborated directly in Phase II of the RIVANA study, for their altruistic participation.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

PDF File

Received 9 June 2016
Accepted 3 August 2016

Corresponding author: Departamento de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pío XII 36, 31007 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain. alvaro.calago@gmail.com

Bibliography

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Observatory (GHO) data. (accessed 29 April 2016). http://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/obesity_text/en/.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and overweight—fact sheet N̊311. 2013. (accessed 29 April 2016). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
3. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766-81.
4. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1983;67:968-77.
5. Despres JP. Body fat distribution and risk of cardiovascular disease: an update. Circulation. 2012;126:1301-13.
6. Pezeshkian M, Noori M, Najjarpour-Jabbari H, et al. Fatty acid composition of epicardial and subcutaneous human adipose tissue. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2009;7:125-31.
7. Bambace C, Telesca M, Zoico E, et al. Adiponectin gene expression and adipocyte diameter: a comparison between epicardial and subcutaneous adipose tissue in men. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2011;20:e153-6.
8. Iacobellis G. Local and systemic effects of the multifaceted epicardial adipose tissue depot. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11:363-71.
9. Iacobellis G, Malavazos AE, Corsi MM. Epicardial fat: from the biomolecular aspects to the clinical practice. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43:1651-4.
10. Iacobellis G, Corradi D, Sharma AM. Epicardial adipose tissue: anatomic, biomolecular and clinical relationships with the heart. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:536-43.
11. Pierdomenico SD, Pierdomenico AM, Cuccurullo F, Iacobellis G. Meta-analysis of the relation of echocardiographic epicardial adipose tissue thickness and the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:73-8.
12. Lee JH, Kim JY, Kim KM, et al. A prospective study of epicardial adipose tissue and incident metabolic syndrome: the ARIRANG study. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28:1762-7.
13. Iacobellis G, Leonetti F. Epicardial adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:6300-2.
14. Fernández Muñoz MJ, Basurto Acevedo L, Córdova Pérez N, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue is associated with visceral fat, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance in menopausal women. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:436-41.
15. Iacobellis G, Assael F, Ribaudo MC, et al. Epicardial fat from echocardiography: a new method for visceral adipose tissue prediction. Obes Res. 2003;11:304-10.
16. Iacobellis G, Ribaudo MC, Assael F, et al. Echocardiographic epicardial adipose tissue is related to anthropometric and clinical parameters of metabolic syndrome: a new indicator of cardiovascular risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:5163-8.
17. Rabkin SW. The relationship between epicardial fat and indices of obesity and the metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2014;12:31-42.
18. Iacobellis G, Leonetti F, Singh N, M Sharma A. Relationship of epicardial adipose tissue with atrial dimensions and diastolic function in morbidly obese subjects. Int J Cardiol. 2007;115:272-3.
19. Watanabe K, Kishino T, Sano J, et al. Relationship between epicardial adipose tissue thickness and early impairment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with preserved ejection fraction. Heart Vessels. 2016;31:1010-5.
20. Baragetti A, Pisano G, Bertelli C, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis is associated with Epicardial Fat Thickness and hepatic steatosis in the general population. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;26:141-53.
21. Mahabadi AA, Berg MH, Lehmann N, et al. Association of epicardial fat with cardiovascular risk factors and incident myocardial infarction in the general population: the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1388-95.
22. Hajsadeghi F, Nabavi V, Bhandari A, et al. Increased epicardial adipose tissue is associated with coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiovascular events. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237:486-9.
23. Xu Y, Cheng X, Hong K, Huang C, Wan L. How to interpret epicardial adipose tissue as a cause of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Coron Artery Dis. 2012;23:227-33.
24. El Khoudary SR, Shin C, Masaki K, et al. Ectopic cardiovascular fat in middle-aged men: effects of race/ethnicity, overall and central adiposity. The ERA JUMP study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015;39:488-94.
25. Vines JJ, Diez J, Guembe MJ, et al. Study of vascular risk in Navarre: objectives and design. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and of vascular risk factors. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2007;30:113-24.
26. Guembe MJ, Toledo E, Barba J, et al. Association between metabolic syndrome or its components and asymptomatic cardiovascular disease in the RIVANA-study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;211:612-7.
27. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report. Circulation. 2002;106:3143-421.
28. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J. Metabolic syndrome--a new world-wide definition. A Consensus Statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. 2006;23:469-80.
29. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention;National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;American Heart Association;World Heart Federation;International Atherosclerosis Society;and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640-5.
30. Gottdiener JS, Bednarz J, Devereux R, et al. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004;17:1086-119.
31. Iacobellis G, Willens HJ. Echocardiographic epicardial fat: a review of research and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1311-9. quiz 1417-8
32. Guallar-Castillón P, Pérez RF, López García E, et al. Magnitude and management of metabolic syndrome in Spain in 2008-2010: the ENRICA study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:367-73.
33. Fernández-Bergés D, Consuegra-Sánchez L, Peñafiel J, et al. Metabolic and inflammatory profiles of biomarkers in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes in a Mediterranean population. DARIOS Inflammatory study. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014;67:624-31.
34. Iacobellis G, Willens HJ, Barbaro G, Sharma AM. Threshold values of high-risk echocardiographic epicardial fat thickness. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008;16:887-92.
35. Bertaso AG, Bertol D, Duncan BB, Foppa M. Epicardial fat: definition, measurements and systematic review of main outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101:e18-28.
36. Eroglu S. How do we measure epicardial adipose tissue thickness by transthoracic echocardiography?. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15:416-9.
37. Mahabadi AA, Massaro JM, Rosito GA, et al. Association of pericardial fat, intrathoracic fat, and visceral abdominal fat with cardiovascular disease burden: the Framingham Heart Study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:850-6.
38. Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:605-13.
39. Hartiala O, Magnussen CG, Bucci M, et al. Coronary heart disease risk factors, coronary artery calcification and epicardial fat volume in the Young Finns Study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1256-63.
40. Shetty R, Vivek G, Naha K, Nayak K, Goyal A, Dias LS. Correlation of epicardial fat and anthropometric measurements in Asian-Indians: A community based study. Avicenna J Med. 2012;2:89-93.
41. Marchington JM, Pond CM. Site-specific properties of pericardial and epicardial adipose tissue: the effects of insulin and high-fat feeding on lipogenesis and the incorporation of fatty acids in vitro. Int J Obes. 1990;14:1013-22.
42. Lai YH, Yun CH, Yang FS, et al. Epicardial adipose tissue relating to anthropometrics, metabolic derangements and fatty liver disease independently contributes to serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein beyond body fat composition: a study validated with computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:234-41.

1885-5857/© 2017 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved